I find myself
musing on the connection between mapping and the depiction of monsters. Mapping
in the past, and mapping for the future. In the history of mapping, the charting
of place and space has also represented the unusual, uncanny beasts which
inhabit ‘the unknown’. Scary monsters, aliens, strange creatures in a strange
land (inspiration for the terminology courtesy of Bowie of course, once again…).
In early
medieval maps like the Hereford Mappa Mundi, the world (that is, the Christian
world) is shown as a circle with 'the East' at the top. East represents Paradise,
the Garden of Eden. The rest of the world is depicted as geographically - and
historically - developing out from that top point. Cities and places are shown,
also events, but what is significant is the inclusion of a variety of
extraordinary creatures, which are indeed ‘scary monsters’ and super beasts.
The creatures
depicted are part of the experience of the mapping. It is not about finding
your way. It is about losing yourself in an experience of being placed. Or
maybe it is not about being placed at all. Quite the opposite, perhaps. Dominic
Harbour (Hereford Cathedral) speaking on BBC programme about the Mappa Mundi says:
"It is... unfathomable...you have to immerse yourself into it."
In these early maps, then, the creatures depicted are shown as strange,
monstrous and unknown, yet the function of these disturbing depictions at the
time was to show the power of God, in that if such beasts could be created by
God's power, then this was the threat of what could exist in the afterlife. The
unusual and the unknown, therefore, was used to ward off uncertainty, in that
if such strange creatures did exist, then it confirmed God's power. The mirabilia (marvels) were necessary:
they proved a moral point.
Yet, of course, now in the 21st century we have moved on from this imaginiative
form of mapping. Our Mappa Mundi is
google earth? But what about the mirabilia -
the scary monsters? Do they still have a function?
We do still seem obsessed with notions of scary monsters, particularly the
unknown creatures of the sea, about which we still know so little. Several
recent news stories are evidence of our persistent interest: giant whales
washed up on beaches at Skegness and Hunstanton, giant squid seen alongside
boat in Japan (and the recent Octopus Village…)…and we do continue to marvel at
these creatures.
Yet, as we learn more about them as zoological species and our technology (and
the numerous videos we can view on You Tube) gives us insight, is the marvelousness
being diluted? We are even told they are not so unusual, not so remarkable. Smithsonian
Zoologist Dr. Clyde Roper (2013) "the world's foremost authority on giant
squid" tells us: "Giant squid are probably not rare, as was once
thought. In fact, since sperm whales regularly feast on them, giant squid must
be quite abundant, perhaps numbering in the many millions within the ocean’s
vast inky depths. But they are hard to find because they occur at depths where
it is challenging and expensive to work."
Facts. Science.
Measurable information. We might know everything if we could fund the
expedition?
Yet, while the 'monsters' become more accessible and less scary, we remain
fascinated by these creatures. Their mystery, their strangeness. Maybe we
want them to remain mirabilia, even
monstrous. Maybe we want to feel that we cannot be reassured by
knowledge.
"She opened strange doors that we'd
never close again......Scary monsters, super creeps. Keep me running, running
scared." (David
Bowie)
(1) Image by Olaus Magnus (born 1490) from a wood-block map titled Carta Marina (printed
Venice, 1539). Magnus also wrote a book titled Historia de Gentibus
Septentrionalibus ("History of the Northern Peoples")
published in Rome in 1555, which explained the images of the sea creatures.
(2) Hereford Mappa Mundi c1300.
(3) (4) The
bodies of sperm whales washed up on British beaches on the east coast -
Gibraltar Point in Skegness.